Nikola Bartunkova vs Yuliya Perapekhina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

How crucial is the second serve in determining the outcome of a tennis match? When diving into the recent form figures, Bartunkova stands with a 38.29% success rate on her second serve points over the last six months, while her counterpart Perapekhina leads with a 45.76% success rate. This often-overlooked aspect can significantly impact the match's final result and forecast accuracy.

Turning our attention to return game statistics, Bartunkova has claimed 51.12% of points on her opponent's second serve, slightly trailing behind Perapekhina's 53.52%. The first serve return stats, showing Bartunkova at 28.95% and Perapekhina at a higher 32.93%, also shed light on which player might have the upper hand in this head-to-head matchup. These numbers can often predict the favored contender in such encounters.

How do these players cope under pressure when faced with breakpoints? In recent times, Bartunkova has saved breakpoints at a commendable rate of 42.47%, outperforming Perapekhina, who has managed to save 35.29%. This particular statistic is invaluable for those keen on in-game betting predictions, as it reveals which player is more likely to withstand crucial match moments.

Looking at the broader performance overview, Bartunkova’s record shines with a 73.08% match win rate over the last year, boasting a win-loss statistic of 19 to 7. Meanwhile, Perapekhina's record reflects a 40% win rate, with a win-loss ratio of 2 to 3, offering a comparative insight into their consistency and head-to-head prediction dynamics. When examining surface performance, Bartunkova’s strongest surface appears to be Hard, with a 74% win rate (14 wins against 5 losses), in contrast to her Clay win rate of 66% (41 wins against 21 losses). In comparison, Perapekhina also has her best results on Hard, securing a 44% win rate (4 wins against 5 losses), indicating an area of apparent equilibrium.

At their respective tournament levels, Bartunkova has frequently competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10K, securing a 72.73% win rate (16 wins to 6 losses). Perapekhina, in contrast, has primarily navigated the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K series, achieving a 40% win rate (2 wins to 3 losses). This difference in tournament stature profoundly influences their competitive trajectories.

Analyzing their opponents' quality, Bartunkova faced opponents with an average rank of 402.54 over the past year, whereas Perapekhina competed against players averaging a rank of 381.8. Such statistics are essential in gauging their adaptability against challengers of varying calibers. When it comes to deciding sets, Bartunkova stands at a 20% win rate over the last year, unlike Perapekhina, who hasn't clinched a deciding set victory yet.

In recent form, Bartunkova converted 35.92% of her breakpoint opportunities, while Perapekhina was slightly better at converting 40%. These compelling statistics open windows for live betting insights when contemplating a breakpoint outcome. In the end, based on recent performances and statistical insights, Bartunkova seems to have the upper hand, especially considering her superior overall play across different surfaces and match circumstances. Will these figures paint an accurate picture in the final showdown?